#30p 4k ultra hd video 1080p
Unfortunately, the drop in quality of the 1080p footage compared to the 4K footage is noticeable. What's more, you get the excellent 5x slow motion in the 120p, which can look really spectacular. This is a nice, healthy list of options that covers the bases for anyone shooting in 1080p, which is a lot of people still. Though it doesn't give you multiple bitrate options for 24p, it does give you two for both 60p, 30p, and 120p (and in their PAL equivalents):
#30p 4k ultra hd video full
In full HD 1080p, the Sony has several more options. If it wasn't in the A7R III, I personally didn't expect it in the A7 III. It was expected however, since none of the Alpha cameras have, to date, been able to handle 4Kp60. In the end, that's my only gripe in terms of the A7 III's 4K offerings. For most, what you find on the A7 III will suffice, though 60p would certainly have been a really nice addition. Now, does every filmmaker need the laundry list of options the GH5 offers? No. We get those three choices in both UHD and Cinema 4K as well.
Not only do we get the high bitrate that the Sony offers, we also get it in a choice among 8 bit (which is the only option on the A7 III), 10 bit, as well as multiple compression options for either two bitrates, All-I or Long GOP. On the GH5, we don't get a full frame sensor, but we do get a great many more options in 4K. That's not honestly a fair comparison, so let's look at the Panasonic GH5 instead, since it's asking price is identical to the Sony. To get that lower quality 4K/60p in the 1DX II, I have to shell out more than double the price of the A7 III. Why? Mostly because that higher quality isn't much different to the naked eye, and creatively-speaking, I'm going to get more out of frame rate options than I will out of that quality boost. Interjecting personal opinion here, I think I prefer having more frame rate options over the higher quality video promised by the A7 III. At this point, video shooters will have to decide what is more important: full sensor readout without pixel binning or line skipping, or slow motion in 4K with a crop. When compared to other full frame offerings, this is generally par for the course with the exception of the Canon 1DX Mark II, which doesn't offer full frame readout like the Sony does. It doesn't have the option to select between UHD and Cinema 4K, and it doesn't offer 4Kp60 either. that's all when it comes to 4K frame rate options on the A7 III. In my side by side video comparison, I would probably not have noticed a difference had I not known there was supposed to be one.Īnd. If you look very closely at 100%, you will see a slight difference in how sharp/vibrant shapes are. Here is the full breakdown of 4K shooting options: For the same length of shooting, you can expect to save a little bit less than half the total storage space between the two and in most cases you won't likely notice any dip in quality. In NTSC, the Sony A7 III offers two different 4K frame rates at two different bitrates: 30p and 24p, at 100 MBPS and 60 MBPS.
0 kommentar(er)
